10 September 2009 FM 3-07.10 / MCRP 3-33.8A / NTTP 3-07.5 / AFTTP 3-2.76
91
command should be used to obtain and disseminate guidance and assistance. The
advisor is responsible for ensuring the intent of the US chain of command is
received and understood by the FF. While FF can be effective within their nation,
their leadership methods may be different. Units with poor leadership will often
benefit from a more active coalition role in mentoring the leadership. Their
operations may lack the standardization expected of US units, but often they will
achieve equal or better results.
(2) The advisor provides recommendations to FF, not orders. Only the counterpart
should issue orders. The FF counterpart is the advisor’s peer not his boss; nor is
the advisor the counterpart’s boss. Given the key advising task of conducting
bilateral negotiations, the advisor will need to study how to achieve a successful
negotiated outcome with the FF counterpart using leverage where appropriate.
Much of the success of an advisor will be based on the personal and professional
relationship he has with his FF counterpart. Advisor duty is definitely “leadership by
example” and the FF counterpart will watch what the advisor does more than listen
to what he says. Saving face and avoiding embarrassment are strong motivators for
FF leadership. What is obvious to us is not obvious to them and vice versa. Clear
communications are essential. Advisors must make sure what was said equates to
what was understood. Politeness and fear of embarrassment can backfire if the
counterpart is afraid to admit he doesn’t understand what was really meant. Advisor
teams also have limited ability to influence FF higher headquarters policies. One of
the major advisor mentoring challenges is to know your target audience and adapt
your methods to the circumstances.
(3) There needs to be a comprehensive understanding throughout the advisor chain
of command. Higher levels need to have feedback on implications and effects of
broad policies. Lower level teams need to have access to raise concerns on how
polices might affect operations, training, and the general effects on the FF and the
AO.
b. Planning Considerations. Understand MDMP versus the British estimate process.
Rather than using the highly structured US MDMP planning model, some FF may be
more comfortable using the British process. The British process fits well with certain
cultural norms and is summarized below. The British estimate process, or
All Arms
Tactical Aide Memo,
Army Code 71770, consists of seven components:
(1) What is the enemy doing and why? (Based on IPOE – terrain/enemy
capabilities and intent.)
(2) What have I been told to do and why? (Based on commander’s intent and
mission analysis.)
(3) What effects do I want to have on the enemy and what direction must I give to
develop a plan?
(4) Where can I best accomplish each action/effect? (Results in outline scheme of
maneuver.)
(5) What resources do I need to accomplish each action/effect? (Relative strength,
troops to task.)