10 September 2009 FM 3-07.10 / MCRP 3-33.8A / NTTP 3-07.5 / AFTTP 3-2.76
59
(2) Methods of Instruction. Advisors should know their material so that they are not
dependent on notes.
(a) Advisors should use hands-on training. It is the absolute best method of
instruction. FF officers should be involved in all training events where their
troops participate. Hands-on training involves:
•
Demonstration.
•
Step-by-step walk through.
•
Practice.
•
Test.
(b) Advisors should not rely on lectures as a method of training. Some FF may
be illiterate so advisors cannot rely only on written media.
(c) Advisors should reinforce bottom-up planning and top-down guidance. This
takes time, but the FF will be more receptive to this methodology once they see it
can contribute to successful missions. Advisors should encourage problem
solving at the lowest level.
(d) Advisors should take advantage of low cost solutions that are technology
independent such as sand tables or table top exercises.
(e) Advisors can use simulation but caution should be exercised when designing
programs around expensive simulation systems.
(f) Advisors reinforce the FF chain of command. Advisors help them solve their
problems; they do not solve their problems for them.
c. Common Pitfalls.
(1) Some members of the FF may try to use the advisor as a scapegoat when tough
/ unpopular decisions have to be made. The FF will take on some of the personality
of their advisors. If the advisors are aggressive, confident, and motivated, they may
be the same.
(2) Some members of the FF may try to influence their advisors with excuses or
even threats to get leaves and passes. Work with the FF leaders to establish an
equitable pass and leave policy that supports them in maintaining the standards.
(3) In many parts of the world, directly confronting someone is considered improper
and results in FF leaders unwilling to confront individuals about performance.
Advisors need to be aware of how they provide feedback and encourage the FF
leaders to adopt a command climate that permits constructive criticism.
(4) The FF leadership may attempt to get advisors involved in simple organizational
problems that they should be handling. Advisors need to be careful to avoid being
seen as decision makers because it will undermine a unit’s morale and
cohesiveness.
(5) Tribal, ethnic, economic, caste, racial, or religious discrimination may be
common within the AO. The advisor should carefully consider mixing diverse groups
to get them to work together. One method to overcome ethnic bias is by promoting