Military reference books and manuals (2009-2023, Volume 4)

AzSPU Substance Abuse Management Programme

Page 18 of 19

14. Substance Abuse Procedure for Azerbaijan Export Pipelines ROW and Block

Valve Stations

15. Substance Abuse Policy Compliance Checklist

Revision/Review Log

Revision Date

Authority

Custodian

Revision Details

03.12.2008

AzSPU Health

Occupational

Initial Issue

manager/Almaz

Health

Periodic Review (No Changes)

Agazade

Adviser/Shahla

Minor Content Revision

Seyidova

Major Content Revision

08.07.2009

AzSPU Health

Offshore Health

Minor Content Revision - Safety

Manager/Almaz

Advisor/Oleg

Assurance Testing in case of staff

Agazade

Minkin

transportation by vessels

15.08.2010

AzSPU Health

Occupational

Document footer: Revision date

Manager/Almaz

Health

changed

Agazade

Lead/Elnur

Mirzazadeh

Front Page:

 Custodian changed.

 Revision date changed.

 Next revision date changed

2.0 Definitions: Health Team

definition is changed.

3.0 General Requirements:

 OMS link is added.

 BP Getting Health Right link

removed.

 BP Group Medical Management

Guide link removed.

 Global Guidance on Substance

Abuse Policies link removed.

4.0 Key Responsibilities: Line

Managers/Supervisors mandatory

participation in Substance Abuse

Awareness session is removed. HR

Manager (or designee) will take

advice from Health Team (not from

HSE).

5.2.6 Company Limit Values. Time off

work will be treated as suspension

pending retest. “Pending without

payment” is removed.

5.2.8 Management of Results.

Mediclub Clinic is added as a

Control Tier:

<<2>>

Revision Date: 15 August 2010

Document Number: << AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00008-2>>

Print Date: 2/1/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE

CONTROLLED VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT

http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu/component/hssesms

BP Azerbaijan Strategic Performance Unit

Substance Abuse

Policy

Policy Statement

BP is committed to providing a safe and healthy working environment for all employees, contractors and visitors. This means an environment which protects well-being and is free from

the effects of alcohol and drug abuse.

Substance abuse impacts on health, safety and productivity by causing ill-health, accidents, absenteeism and sub-standard performance. BP cannot expect to be immune from the

potential impact of a growing problem in society and will manage this by a programme of education, medical treatment, discipline, testing and reporting as appropriate.

Education

BP will establish and maintain a substance abuse education programme to help ensure a high level of awareness for all employees. There will be specific training for line management in

the recognition and management of impaired individuals.

Medical Treatment

Dependency on any substance is a condition requiring care and support. Employees who seek assistance voluntarily may be directed through the occupational health service to

confidential advice, support, treatment, sickness absence and rehabilitation as appropriate and available. Depending on individual circumstances BP may underwrite all or part of such

counseling, treatment and/or rehabilitation. Principles of medical confidentiality will apply in all such cases.

Discipline

Alcohol is not permitted on any part of BP Azerbaijan Strategic Performance Unit operation. Consumption, sale or possession of alcohol on BP premises without prior authorization will

result in disciplinary measures. Limited consumption of alcohol on company premises in conjunction with official company functions will be permitted only with the prior approval of a

senior manager. Alcohol is not permitted in any BP camp unless a formal dispensation is in existence.

The possession, distribution, sale and use of illicit drugs or associated paraphernalia, or improper use of other substances, failure to cooperate with a reasonable request to test or being

in a state of impairment during working hours due to substance abuse, will be treated as gross misconduct leading to disciplinary proceedings which may result in dismissal.

In the context of this policy, ‘substance’ includes alcohol, illicit drugs, prescription and over the counter medication or any other substance which when used can impair and individual’s

ability to perform his/her professional duties. Improper use of any substance resulting in impairment of job safety performance or ability to represent BP in an appropriate manner will

result in disciplinary measures.

Prescribed or ‘over the counter’ medicines which could affect an individual’s performance or judgment must be declared to and discussed with a member of the Health and Safety or site

management team prior to any use on working days. Failure to do so will be a violation of this policy.

Contractors, subcontractors, agents and visitors found to be in breach of BP Azerbaijan SPU substance abuse policy will be excluded from BP premises and may not be allowed to return

in the future.

Testing

BP reserves the right to test employees/contractors/subcontractors for substance abuse in the following circumstances:

1. Pre-employment/ Periodic or Pre-placement

5. During Rehabilitation

2. Post-Incident

6. Return to work Testing after a Positive prohibited Substance Test

3. Reasonable Suspicion

7. Follow up Testing

4. Safety Assurance (Random or in 100% of cases)

8.Site/Location Unannounced Testing

Any substance abuse testing undertaken will be conducted pursuant to the guidelines set forth in the Substance Abuse Management Programme accompanying this policy and will

follow non-discriminatory principles and scrupulous quality assurance processes according to current best practice.

Any employee who tests positive for the presence of prohibited substances in the amount equal to or exceeding the levels set forth in the accompanying programme and procedures

will be in violation of this policy and will be subject to discipline, up to and including dismissal.

Any employee, who refuses to undergo a test required by this policy; adulterates or makes a substitution of a requested specimen, will be subject to discipline, up to and including

dismissal.

The on-call Incident Management Team (IMT) members are expected to refrain from consumption of alcohol while on duty. Any acting member of an incident team is subject to

substance testing while at work and subject to the same disciplinary measures as any other employee in a safety-sensitive job.

In support of its Substance Abuse policy, the Company may conduct searches considered appropriate to ensure safe and efficient operations. Conditions under which a search may be

considered include, but are not limited to, reasonable suspicion of drug or alcohol use or possession, or following an incident, which triggers a drug or alcohol test. Any search will be

done with the owner present and will be conducted by two responsible people. Refusal to consent to search performed under this policy will have to be documented, is a disciplinary

matter and may result in dismissal.

Reporting and Government Regulations

Being under alcoholic intoxication during working hours is regarded as a violation of work discipline, therefore such cases will not be reported to any external authorities.

According to the Criminal Codes of Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey possession of illegal drugs is a criminal offence. Considering that the Company is not an investigating body and

therefore cannot verify the lawfulness of acquisition of drugs, the Company may inform the prosecutor’s office on the finding or consumption of drugs by an employee depending on the

facts of a particular case.

Contractors, subcontractors, agents and visitors

Contractors, subcontractors of any tier, agents or visitors who perform labour or provide services on BP premises must comply with BP’s current policy. The term ‘BP premises’ means

all property owned, operated, leased by or under the control of BP.

Each Contractor with employees in safety sensitive positions must have and administer a formal substance abuse policy. Contractors shall submit a copy of their policy and programme

to the BP representative. The Policy should cover, as a minimum, awareness and education, medical treatment, testing and discipline. Substance testing of employees should generally

conform to the minimum standards as set forth in this policy.

BP reserves the right to audit any contractor/sub-contractor against the agreed policy provisions and to deny entry to its premises for employees that fail the substance abuse policy

requirements.

Policy Enforcement

The enforcement of this policy is the responsibility of the line management; the HSSE department will have overall accountability for Azerbaijan SPU substance abuse policy;

administration of various parts of the policy falls to HR and HSSE departments. In addition, advice and counsel may be sought from the Legal or relevant Corporate departments. For

detailed guidance of policy enforcement see Substance Abuse Programme accompanying this policy.

Rashid Javanshir

Azerbaijan SPU President

April , 2010

AzSPU HSSE&S MS Procedure for Action Tracking Using Tr@ction

Page 3 of 13

1 Purpose/Scope

The purpose of this document is to define roles, responsibilities and procedures for tracking

findings and actions resulting from Incident Reports (IRs), Audits, Hazard and Operability Studies

(HazOps) and Other Events in Tr@ction.

This document describes the following:

 Roles and responsibilities for Tr@ction Owners, Originators, Approvers and Responsible

Parties.

 Granting access and security approval to Tr@ction users.

 Procedures for data entry into Tr@ction.

 Tracking and reporting the status of actions from IRs, Audits, HazOps, and Other Events.

 Priority Ranking of Action Items.

 Closure of Action Items.

 Quality control and assurance of data in Tr@ction.

For general guidance on using Tr@ction, refer to the AzSPU Tr@ction User’s Guide (AzSPU-

HSSE-DOC-00119-A1), or the online help guide at the Tr@ction web site. Additional questions

should be addressed to your Local Tr@ction System Administrator (LTSA).

2 Definitions

Action Item: A record within the Tr@ction database that documents an action derived from an IR,

Audit, HazOp or Other Event. Actions are assigned to a Responsible Party with a target date for

completion. An Action Item can be a corrective action, a preventive action, or an action to further

investigate correction or prevention.

Approver: The Approver is normally the Owner of the Incident/Audit/Event/HazOp and is a named

individual selected by the report Originator. Approver/Owner is responsible for agreeing actions

with the Investigation Team, checking for quality and approving them after completion.

The level of the Approver/Owner must commensurate with the actual severity or potential severity

of the incident and should be:

 SPU Leader (SPUL) for major incidents in AzSPU (all actual level A-E incidents other

than fatality).

 Vice President (VP) for HiPos (potential severity A-E).

 Area/Well/Logistics Operations Manager for all actual level F severity incidents.

 Site/Facility/Installation Manager actual or potential incident severity Levels G-H.

Approver also refers to the security level within Tr@ction that allows an individual to approve IRs

and Action Items. An individual’s supervisor, or LTSA, grants this security level.

Other Event: Other Event is designed to capture all events not otherwise specified by other

categories or incident types in Tr@ction.

Control Tier: 2-AzSPU

Revision Date: August 18, 2010

Document Number: AzSPU-HSSE-DOC-00119-2

Print Date: 2/1/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://bp1houdm004/dkazspu

AzSPU HSSE&S MS Procedure for Action Tracking Using Tr@ction

Page 4 of 13

HazOp: A Hazard and Operability Study (HazOp) is a process hazard analysis methodology used

to identify hazards in the workplace. The records contain identified hazards, risk ranking and

recommendations to mitigate the hazard risks.

Incident: An unplanned event or occurance that affects or has a potential to affect the health or

safety, or security of:

 People, or

 Assets, or

 The environment

Incident Report (IR): A report in Tr@ction for incidents.

Originator: The individual who enters an IR, Audit, HazOp, or Other Event into Tr@ction.

Owner: The owner is the individual that requests that the IR, Audit, HazOp, Event is carried out

and has the responsibility for any of these through to closeout of the remedial actions.

Responsible Party: The individual who has been assigned an Action Item arising from an

Incident Investigation, Audit, HazOp or Event. This person is responsible for the closure of an

Action Item entered into the Tr@ction database by the Target Date. This is typically an employee

or contractor with financial authority and access to resources necessary to effect implementation

of an assigned Action Item, and to document closure of the Action Item in Tr@ction.

Tr@ction (Tr@ction actions tracking system): A web based system used across the Group

enabling businesses and functions to record health, safety, security and environmental data.

Quality Verifier: A person responsible to review Tr@ction entries for technical QA/QC.

3 General Requirements



ISO 14001 - 4.5.2 Nonconformance and Corrective and Preventive Action.



OHSAS 18001:1999 - 4.5.2 Accidents, incidents, nonconformances and corrective and

preventative action.



gHSEr

- Element

12: Incidents, Analysis and Prevention

(12.1-12.6). Element

13:

Assessment, Assurance and Improvement (13.7)



BP Global HSSE Compliance Management Framework - Step 4: Measurement, Evaluation

and Corrective Action (4.3-4.6)



Integrity Management System - Element 9: Incident Investigation and Learning.



Control of Work Standard - Element 11: Internal and External Lessons Learned.



Group Defined Practice (GDP) GDP 4.4-0001 on Reporting HSSE and Operational

Incidents.



Group Defined Practice (GDP) GDP 4.4-0002 on Incident Investigation.

4 Key Responsibilities

SPUL/ AOM/Site Manager: Undertakes Approver’s role for Incidents. Responsible for approving

assignment of Tr@ction security access levels to BP and agency staff. Audits, HazOps and Other

Control Tier: 2-AzSPU

Revision Date: August 18, 2010

Document Number: AzSPU-HSSE-DOC-00119-2

Print Date: 2/1/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://bp1houdm004/dkazspu

AzSPU HSSE&S MS Procedure for Action Tracking Using Tr@ction

Page 5 of 13

Events can be approved by Managers and Team Leaders of any discipline in addition to the

responsible persons listed above.

Area HSE TL or Site HSE Advisor: Responsible for ensuring that Tr@ction is being properly

used in accordance with this procedure, and for defining incident categories, and, in consultation

with the appropriate subject matter experts, providing rationale for the determination, also

reviewing safety-related IRs as needed to ensure quality of descriptions and corrective and

preventive actions.

Environmental Advisor: Responsible for reviewing each Environmental Event IR. Confirms the

event category as either an: Environmental event, non-issue, near-miss, non-conformance or

violation, in line with applicable HSSE&S procedures and legal and other requirements, and

provides a rationale for the determination.

Local Tr@ction System Administrator (LTSA): LTSA at PU level, Primary LTSA at SPU level.

Responsible for providing system access to BP and agency staff after appropriate approvals

received. Also responsible for:

 Acting as liaison with the Global Tr@ction System Administrator (GTSA) concerning the

operational support of the database.

 Making changes to pull down menus and other local database changes as needed.

 Maintaining a list of Responsible Parties.

 Maintaining records of approval for access and security level assignments.

 Providing general quality control of the Tr@ction system.

All system changes such as adding or removing LTSA controlled objects in Tr@ction should be

communicated to Primary LTSA for approval.

In addition to the above, Primary LTSA is responsible for:

 Generating and distributing monthly reports on overdue and extended Action Items to ALT.

 Generating and distributing monthly reports on Action Items.

 Performing monthly technical checks on completeness of report information entered and timely

approval in Traction.

Originator: Nominated by the Owner, responsible for entering IRs, Audits, Other Events or

HazOps into Tr@ction.

Owner: Responsible for ensuring that tasks are assigned to the appropriate individual or job

position who has sufficient authority and expertise to complete the work.

The Owner shall:

 Appoint the Investigation Team

 Draw up the terms of reference for the investigation

 Provide a business overview on actions prior to entry into the tracking system and shall review

each action item for confidentiality

 Review the selection of the Responsible Party for handling the action items

 Ensuring the Responsible Party clearly understands the Action Items and is in full agreement

with the requirements and timing for completion of the actions.

Control Tier: 2-AzSPU

Revision Date: August 18, 2010

Document Number: AzSPU-HSSE-DOC-00119-2

Print Date: 2/1/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://bp1houdm004/dkazspu

AzSPU HSSE&S MS Procedure for Action Tracking Using Tr@ction

Page 6 of 13

 Ensure that all new or reassigned action items are entered into Tr@ction under the appropriate

category

 Review progress reports to ensure that all outstanding action items are being completed within

specified deadlines

 Shall take appropriate action with the Responsible Party if action items are not being

completed within the specified deadlines.

Approver: Approver and Owner are identical roles; the name varies depending on the record type

(Audit, IR, Event, etc.). Main responsibility of the Approver is to ensure that appropriate

hazards/findings have been identified and that the Action Items will effectively mitigate the specific

root causes/issues identified. It is the Approver’s responsibility to ensure that information in the

report is correctly entered and later updated, where and if applicable. Approver also approves

each Action Item for closure.

Additional responsibilities include:

 Reviewing the selection of Responsible Party for handling the Action Item to ensure it is

assigned to the appropriate individual, or job position, that has sufficient authority and

expertise to carry out the action, and ensure that the target date and priority of the Action Item

are appropriate and communicated to the Responsible Party.

 In addition, if comments provided in the Action Item closure note do not clearly reflect how the

action has been addressed, the Approver can reject the closure of the Action Item stating the

reason in the “Reason for Rejection” field.

Responsible Party: Responsible for reviewing, with the Owner or Approver, the Action Items to

clearly understand the completion requirements, documentation, and timing. Amendments can be

made to the Action Items if considered inappropriate. Also responsible for:

 Ensuring all their Action Items are completed by the target date.

 Updating the status of their Action Items, closing their Action Items in Tr@ction when

completed.

 Providing clear closing comment describing the tasks carried out to complete the Action Item.

Simply inserting “done” or “complete” is not sufficient information.

Quality Verifier:

 Ensure correct classification of incidents and selection of right fields in Traction, and drive

update of the record with the Originator/Approver

 Review quality and depth of the investigation, e.g. ensure correct identification of immediate

and root causes, and make intervention with the Owner/Approver where necessary

 Identify training needs and provide awareness materials for re-training/refreshing the traction

users

A simple process for incident registration, verification and approval

1) Originator registers the incident and the associated actions in the Traction system;

2) Approver - approves the report;

3) Quality Verifier provide technical QA/QC of the report and instigates update where necessary.

List of the Quality Verifiers:

CoW related incidents - AzSPU CoW/Safety Systems Lead

IM, PS, LOPC related incidents - AzSPU Process Safety TA

Driving incidents - AzSPU Driving Compliance TA

Injuries' medical classification and job relatedness - AzSPU Occupational Health Lead

Marine incident - AzSPU Marine Authority

Control Tier: 2-AzSPU

Revision Date: August 18, 2010

Document Number: AzSPU-HSSE-DOC-00119-2

Print Date: 2/1/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://bp1houdm004/dkazspu

AzSPU HSSE&S MS Procedure for Action Tracking Using Tr@ction

Page 7 of 13

Note: In cases where multiple disciplines are affected, all relevant verifiers should be engaged.

5 Procedure

5.1 Entering Findings

A complete list of the records that are required to be uploaded into Tr@ction is provided in the

AzSPU Tr@ction Users’s Guide (AzSPU-HSSE-DOC-00119-A1).

5.1.1 Entering Incident Reports

Full information on Incident reporting and Tr@ction entry can be obtained in the AzSPU Incident

Investigation and Reporting Procedure (AzSPU-HSSE-DOC-00054-2).

Initial reports on BP Employee and Contractor Recordable Injuries, Vehicle Accidents, and

Uncontrolled Releases and Spills (regardless of volume), security incidents, fires and explosions

within BP operations control sphere should be entered into Tr@ction within 5 days, as per Group

requirements. A List of Events and Reporting Frequency are provided in Appendix A of this

procedure.

All supporting documentation shall be attached to the Tr@ction report.

For reporting purposes, all Incidents for the month must be approved by close of business on the

5^th work day (5WD) of the following month

5.1.2 Entering Other Events

Other Event is designed to capture all events not otherwise specified by other categories or

incident types in Tr@ction. There are no findings or recommendation fields. Action Items are

entered and tracked as for other records. All supporting documentation shall be attached to the

Tr@ction report.

5.1.3 Entering Audits

Recording of the following types of significant audits is required in Tr@ction:

 Contractor

 ISO 14001 EMS, Compliance Audits

 Financial

 S&OI (Safety and Operations Integrity) Audit

 CoW (Control of Work)

 PHSER (Project HSE Review) - all stages

 MAR (Major Accident Risk) Actions

 Process Technical Safety

 Metering - Partner Audit

 MoC (Management of Change) Audits

 PSCR (Pre-Startup Compliance Review) Audits

 IM (Integrity Management) Standard Internal Audits

 IM Standard External Audits

Asset / jobsite inspections and audits are uploaded into local Action Tracking Systems in

accordance with the AzSPU HSSE&S Non-Compliance and Corrective and Preventative Action

Procedure (AzSPU-HSSE-DOC-00040-2).

Audit findings are uploaded into Tr@ction by the Audit Owner / Originator and it is Audit Owner’s

responsibility to monitor the quality of actions closure. All supporting documentation shall be

attached to the Tr@ction report.

Control Tier: 2-AzSPU

Revision Date: August 18, 2010

Document Number: AzSPU-HSSE-DOC-00119-2

Print Date: 2/1/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://bp1houdm004/dkazspu

AzSPU HSSE&S MS Procedure for Action Tracking Using Tr@ction

Page 8 of 13

5.1.4 Entering HazOps

HazOp summary, findings, recommendations and Action Items are entered into Tr@ction by the

HazOp Owner / Originator. All supporting documentation shall be attached to the Tr@ction report.

5.2 Entering Action Items

IRs, Audits, HazOps and Other Events can each have one or more Action Items entered into

Tr@ction. Investigation team should identify initial preventive and corrective actions through the

investigation process. Records where definitive corrective or preventive actions have not been

identified yet need not have Action Items entered into Tr@ction. The authorized personnel can

identify Action Items after approval of the initial Tr@ction report and update the report accordingly.

Originators, Approvers, and other persons adding actions to a Tr@ction record must adhere to the

following guidelines:

 Before assigning an Action Item to a Responsible Party, the action must be discussed with the

Responsible Party and the Action and Target Date agreed.

 Target Dates should be realistically set and in line with chosen Priority (1, 2 or 3).

 Only relevant Action Items that are clear and useful must be entered.

 Closure comments should clearly state what has been done, i.e. closing comment stating

“complete” should be avoided.

5.2.1 Action Item Type

Action Item Type must be indicated when assigning an Action Item. Standard Action Item Types

that should be used in AzSPU are:

 CM&ER

 Control of Work

 Driving Safety Standard

 Environment

 GHSER

 Group High Value Learning Action

 Health

 Integrity Related

 MAR Action Above GRL

 MAR Action Below GRL

 MAR risk reduction action

 Safety

 Security

 Regulatory Compliance

 Social

 Not Applicable

When Action Item Type relates to more than one category, multiple selection can be made using

the Control key.

5.2.2 Prioritizing Action Items

The investigation process shall identify actions to prevent recurrence. To ensure that critical

HSSE issues are identified and addressed promptly, Tr@ction requires the creator of a new

Action Item to determine the priority ranking for it. Actions shall be ranked for priority as follows:

Control Tier: 2-AzSPU

Revision Date: August 18, 2010

Document Number: AzSPU-HSSE-DOC-00119-2

Print Date: 2/1/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://bp1houdm004/dkazspu

AzSPU HSSE&S MS Procedure for Action Tracking Using Tr@ction

Page 9 of 13

Priority 1 - High - Requires immediate action before activity at the site resumes.

Priority 2 - Medium - Must be completed to an agreed plan.

Priority 3 - Low - Should be considered by the Owner but is not a priority.

5.2.3 Action Item Target Date Revision

If the designated time frame for the closure of the Action Item requires an extension, the

Responsible Party shall enter the action item screen, press Change Target Date, select/indicate

Revised Target Date, document/fill in Reason for Change and press Finish. Once done the

system generates automated email to Approver asking approve or reject the change.

Target Date should not be revised more than once. However, as the system technically

allows users to do so, it is under the relevant Approver’s responsibility to accept over one

revision(s) of the originally set target date.

5.2.4 Close Out of Action Items

Action Items closure of any Tr@ction record (IR, Event, Audit, HazOp) is a two step process:

Step 1: Completion Date and Closure Comment is entered in Action Item fields in Tr@ction by the

Responsible Party and updated.

Step 2: Completed Action Item is approved in Tr@ction by the Owner/Approver of the record.

Only when both steps are completed is the Action Item considered closed.

5.3 Notification

Tr@ction maintains an internal messaging feature that generates automated e-mails in line with

the follow-up and communication processes of the system. Tr@ction sends out automatic

notifications when:

 New reports are entered into the system.

 Action Items are entered and distributed to the Responsible Party for follow up.

 An Action Item has been completed and awaits approval from the Owner / Approver.

 An Action Item is overdue.

5.4 Communicating Lessons Learned

Once incidents, near misses or audit results have been entered into Tr@ction and issues have

been thoroughly investigated and resolved, any lessons learned or messages arising out of the

incident should be communicated widely - both within BP and to other BP Business Units, if

appropriate. The following are appropriate avenues for broadcasting these “Lessons Learned”:

 One Pager LL Document

 HSE bulletins

 E-mail notifications for AzSPU Management

 Presentations at crew HSSE meetings

 Notifications in BP newsletters

Control Tier: 2-AzSPU

Revision Date: August 18, 2010

Document Number: AzSPU-HSSE-DOC-00119-2

Print Date: 2/1/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://bp1houdm004/dkazspu

AzSPU HSSE&S MS Procedure for Action Tracking Using Tr@ction

Page 10 of 13

 E-mail distribution.

Lessons learned are generally distributed by members of the incident investigation team, or by

HSE Advisors.

Note: AzSPU outside distribution of Lessons Learned One-Pagers for HiPO and MIA, HiPlus and

similar documents should not go from individual assets but from SPUL office.

5.5 Managing Access and Security Levels for Tr@ction

Information stored in Tr@ction can be sensitive and confidential. To protect users, subjects and

BP itself, it is important to limit access only to approved individuals and to maintain security

precautions.

Tr@ction therefore has the following security access levels (described in more detail in the

AzSPU Tr@ction User’s Guide (AzSPU-HSSE-DOC-00119-A1)):

 Restricted User: Default security level assigned to new Tr@ction users. This level can input

and view only own records.

 General User: Security level that allows the user to create, edit their own records and view

approved records input by others for his or her performance unit (with the exception of

confidential records).

 Approver: Security level that allows an individual to approve IRs and Action Items.

 Business Unit Editor

(BU Editor): Security level for selected HSE Professionals and

designated Tr@ction users; allows creation, limited editing and viewing of all non-confidential

PU records and reports.

 Local Tr@ction System Administrator (LTSA): Custodian of the system, can view, fully edit

and delete all records except for those established as confidential.

 Global Tr@ction System Administrator (GTSA): Administrator for Tr@ction, edits and

maintains globally mandated fields, screens and reports.

5.6 QA/QC of Tr@ction Data

There are four levels of quality assurance for Tr@ction data.

1) The Originator is responsible for entering factual data and reviewing the report for accuracy

before submitting it.

2) The Owner / Approver is responsible for reviewing all reports and actions items for accuracy

and validity before approving.

3) The PU LTSA provides the Owners/Approvers as appropriate with periodic status reports on a

weekly or monthly basis. Status reports will document closure of actions and identification of

overdue and extended actions.

4) The Central HSE Safety Team monitors Tr@ction records on a monthly basis, intervening

when appropriate, and providing Action Closure Status Reports on a monthly basis.

6 Key Documents/Tools/References

Control Tier: 2-AzSPU

Revision Date: August 18, 2010

Document Number: AzSPU-HSSE-DOC-00119-2

Print Date: 2/1/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://bp1houdm004/dkazspu

AzSPU HSSE&S MS Procedure for Action Tracking Using Tr@ction

Page 11 of 13

 Tr@ction web site

http://hsse.bpweb.bp.com/Tr@ction

 AzSPU Tr@ction User’s Guide (AzSPU-HSSE-DOC-00119-A1).

http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkAzSPU:/published/hse/documents/AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00119-A1

 AzSPU Non-Compliance and Corrective and Preventative Action Procedure (AzSPU-HSSE-

DOC-00040-2).

http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkAzSPU:/published/hse/documents/AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00040-2

 AzSPU Incident Investigation and Reporting Procedure (AzSPU-HSSE-DOC-00054-2).

http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkAzSPU:/published/hse/documents/AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00054-2

 HSSE & Operational Data Reporting Requirements for BP Group, FC&A website.

http://finance.bpweb.bp.com/en/local_assets/documents/Standards_and_Practices/Group_HS

SE/HSSE_Operational_Reporting_requirements_for_Group_final.doc

 Group HSSE Definitions, FC&A website.

http://finance.bpweb.bp.com/en/local_assets/documents/Group_HSE_Definitions.doc

 Group Defined Practice (GDP) GDP 4.4-0001 on Reporting HSSE and Operational Incidents.

http://omslibrary.bpweb.bp.com/GroupOMSLibrary/Requirement/GDP/GDP_4_4_0001.doc

 Group Defined Practice (GDP) GDP 4.4-0002 on Incident Investigation.

http://omslibrary.bpweb.bp.com/GroupOMSLibrary/Requirement/GDP/GDP_4_4_0002.doc

Control Tier: 2-AzSPU

Revision Date: August 18, 2010

Document Number: AzSPU-HSSE-DOC-00119-2

Print Date: 2/1/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://bp1houdm004/dkazspu

AzSPU HSSE&S MS Procedure for Action Tracking Using Tr@ction

Page 13 of 13

Appendix A - HSSE Data That Must Be Reported to the Group

and Reporting Frequency

Type of Incident

Recording Timescale

Recording System

Major Incidents (MIAs)

<24 hours

MIA/HiPo database

Levels A-E

<5 days

Traction

High Potential Incidents (HiPos)

<24 hours or on

MIA/HiPo database

identification

<5 days

Traction

Any BP Employee Fatality in the BP Work

<24 hours

MIA/HiPo database

Related Boundary

<5 days

Traction

Any BP Contractor Fatality in the BP Work

<24 hours

MIA/HiPo database

Related Boundary

<5 days

Traction

Any Third Party Fatality in the BP

<24 hours

MIA/HiPo database

Operated boundary

<5 days

Traction

Any non work-related Fatality in the BP

<24 hours

MIA/HiPo database

Operated boundary

<5 days

Traction

Loss of Primary Containment (LOPC)

<5 days

Traction

Security incidents

<5 days

Traction

Day Away from Work Case-Employee

<5 days

Traction

Day Away from Work Case-Contractor

<5 days

Traction

Restricted Work/Job Transfer-Employee

<5 days

Traction

Restricted Work/Job Transfer-Contractor

<5 days

Traction

Medical Treatment-Employee

<5 days

Traction

Medical Treatment-Contractor

<5 days

Traction

Loss of consciousness

<5 days

Traction

A significant injury or illness diagnosed by

<5 days

Traction

a physician or other licensed health

professional, such as cancer, chronic

irreversible disease, fractured or cracked

bone, or punctured eardrum

Needlestick and cuts from sharp objects

<5 days

Traction

that are contaminated with another

person’s blood or other potentially

infectious material

Medical removal under Government

<5 days

Traction

standards

Occupational hearing loss (current hearing

<5 days

Traction

test must show 10dBA shift from current

baseline and total cumulative hearing loss

must be 25dBA or move above

audiometric zero).

Vehicle Accidents-Employee

<5 days

Traction

Vehicle Accidents-Contractor

<5 days

Traction

Spills >1 bbl

<5 days

Traction

Uncontrolled Releases/Events

<5 days

Traction

Fires

<5 days

Traction

Explosions

<5 days

Traction

Control Tier: 2-AzSPU

Revision Date: August 18, 2010

Document Number: AzSPU-HSSE-DOC-00119-2

Print Date: 2/1/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://bp1houdm004/dkazspu

1.0 Purpose

The Waste Management Instructions (WMI) provide a means with which to achieve a common approach

to the management of waste across AzSPU, including Georgia.

They are intended to both guide and instruct those personnel involved in the management of waste.

Each WMI is structured as follows:



Description of waste;



Hazard classification;



Handling procedures at point of production;



Transportation procedures;



Handling procedures at CWAA to point of treatment or disposal;



Administrative procedures;



Additional Information.

2.0 Specific Requirements

WMIs are to be referred to when determining how to manage and classify waste and when completing

Waste Transfer Notes. The use of WMIs will help ensure uniformity in the management of waste

throughout AzSPU and will reinforce waste management operational controls that are required for ISO

14001. The WMIs should be used in conjunction with existing documents that provide specific site and

generic guidance. Existing documents include:



Offshore Waste Management Procedure, AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00007-3;



Azerbaijan Export Pipelines Waste Management Procedure AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00302-4;



Sangachal Terminal Waste Management Procedure AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00037-4;



Reporting of Bulk Liquid Wastes Shipped to Shore for Treatment & Disposal AZSPU-HSSE-

DOC-00100;



Approved Waste Management Contractors: Azerbaijan AzSPU-HSSE-DOC-00069-2.

3.0 Key Responsibilities

In order that the WMIs remain up to date and continue to meet the needs of all users it is essential that

they are maintained and that feedback is provided if and when shortfalls become apparent.

Responsibilities are as follows:

 Regulatory, Compliance and Environmental Manager is the authority for the instructions and

as such is responsible for their completeness and maintenance.

 Waste Management Operations Team (WM Ops) is responsible for collating feedback and

forwarding to Waste Management Specialists on a monthly (end of month) basis.

 On-site Operations personnel responsible for Waste Management are responsible for

providing feedback to WM Ops as and when it is noted that a particular instruction does not

meet their needs e.g. it is ambiguous, inaccurate or there is insufficient information.

 Environmental Advisors responsible for Management Systems need to amend their HSSE

procedures to reflect the presence and use of WMIs.

4.0 Waste Management Instructions

WMIs are listed at Appendix 1 with access via their respective hyperlinks.

Appendix 1

Waste Management Instructions

Control Tier:

Revision Date: 11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00126-2

Print Date:

2/1/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED VERSION OF THIS

DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu/

Page 2 of 5

Serial

Waste Stream

Absorbents other than oily rags

Acids

Activated Carbon

Adhesive (Solvent Based)

Aerosol Cans

Air Drying Desiccant

Alkalis

Amine

Antifreeze Coolant

Asbestos Containing Materials

Ballast Water

Base oil recovered from ITD

Batteries Dry Cell

Batteries Wet cell

Biocides

Bitumen Asphalt used

Bituminous pipe wrapping

Blasting Grit

Book Cell

Brine 1(Waste)

Brine 2 (Waste)

Buoys Plastic

Cartridges (Printer and Toner)

Caustic Soda

Cement (returned from down hole)

Ceramic Packing

Charcoal Filters

Chemicals (used from laboratory)

Chlorine tablets

Clinical waste (Medicine)

Clinical Waste (Sharps)

Clothing and PPE

Completion fluids (calcium bromide)

Construction waste

Cooking oil

Detergents

Drill Cuttings (SBM)

Drill Cuttings (WBM)

Drill Cuttings (Low Tox)

Drilling Fluids Contaminated Mud 1 (SBM)

Drilling Fluids Contaminated Mud 2 (OBM)

Drilling Fluids Contaminated Mud 3 (WBM)

Drums Metal (Empty)

Drums Plastic (Empty)

Electrical & Electronic Equipment (Waste)

Control Tier:

Revision Date: 11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00126-2

Print Date:

2/1/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED VERSION OF THIS

DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu/

Page 3 of 5

AzSPU Waste Management Strategy

Page 2 of 17

Table of Contents

Section

Title

Page

Introduction

¾ 1.1. Purpose

¾ 1.2. Scope

Policies and Practices

¾ 2.1. PSAs, HGAs and IGA

¾ 2.2 HSSE Policy

¾ 2.3. BP Group Practises

¾ 2.4. AzSPU Commitments

¾ 2.5 Other Commitments

¾ 2.6. Waste Management Instructions

¾ 2.7.Waste Streams Register

¾ 2.8. Waste Contractor Approval

¾ 2.9. Compliance Management System

¾ 2.10. BPEO Assessments

Waste Management Infrastructure

Implementation (2008-2010)

¾ Azerbaijan

¾ Georgia

¾ BTC Turkey

Responsibilities

Document Control

App. 1

Index of Waste Management Instructions

App. 2

Waste Management Compliance Papers

App. 3

Waste Management MoCs & Deviations

References

AzSPU-HSSE-DOC-00253-2 - AzSPU Waste Management RASCI chart

AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00254-2 - AzSPU Integrated Waste Strategy Milestone Plan

AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00084-2 - AzSPU Waste Streams Register

AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00126-2 - AzSPU Waste Management Instructions

AzSPU-HSSE-DOC-00069-2 - AzSPU Approved Waste Management Contractors

BP Environmental Performance Requirements 11 - Waste Management (EPR-11)

Control Tier:

Revision Date: 11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00068-2

Print Date: 01/02/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu

AzSPU Waste Management Strategy

Page 3 of 17

1. Introduction

1.1

Purpose

On behalf of its partners, BP Exploration (Caspian Sea) Ltd. (BP) is developing and operating

exploration, production and export facilities for oil and gas in the region (Azerbaijan, Georgia &

Turkey). These activities generate construction and operational non-hazardous and hazardous

wastes that require appropriate management.

The purpose of this document is:



To describe the overall BP Azerbaijan Strategic Performance Unit (AzSPU) waste strategy

for Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey setting out governing principles and policies;



To describe AzSPU roles and responsibilities for waste management;



To describe existing operations and key milestones 2008-2010.

1.2

Scope

This strategy covers waste management relating to AzSPU operations and project sites in

Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey. It can also be used, if relevant, to support other BP business in

the region as it was for Black Sea Exploration in 2006.

This revision includes specific strategic milestones 2006-2008.

2. Policies and Practices

EPR-11.3

Provision for waste management shall be made in all Contracts and Agreements

(Production Sharing Agreement, Host Government Agreement and Inter-Governmental

Agreements)

2.1

PSAs, HGAs and IGA

BP is the Operator under the Azeri Chirag Gunashli (ACG), Shah Deniz (SD), and other Production

Sharing Agreements (PSAs) as well as the Western Route Export Pipeline (WREP). BP AzSPU

operates the Baku-Tblisi-Ceyhan pipeline

(BTC) and the South Caucasus Pipeline (SCP) in

accordance with the provisions of the corresponding Host Government Agreements (HGAs) and

the Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA). BP conducts its offshore and onshore business in line with

these Agreements together with the requirement of the applicable Country legal requirements.

In Azerbaijan, the PSAs require that national laws are adhered to with respect to HSE to the extent

where these laws are not more stringent than current international Petroleum industry standards

and practices (ACG) or Environmental Protection Standards (SD)

Under the 5 HGAs, the BTC/SCP/WREP pipelines are subject to standards and practices prevailing

in the international petroleum pipeline industry for comparable projects taking into account

standards and practices required by national laws. HGA specific requirements include: UK Health &

Safety standards (SCP Az); UK & World Bank Environmental standards (SCP Ge); Dutch &

Austrian Environmental standards (BTC Ge); Pipeline Construction and Operating Agreement

(WREP Ge). The BTC IGA provides further requirements for adoption of standards and practices

within the petroleum pipeline industry no less stringent than those applied within member states of

the European Union. The most stringent standards of the National Law, EU directives and World

Bank Guidelines apply to BTC.

In Azerbaijan there are Agreements on the Disposal of Surplus Assets which allows for the transfer

of obsolete and surplus material, equipment or facilities to SOFAZ. This route is used to minimize

Control Tier:

Revision Date: 11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00068-2

Print Date: 01/02/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu

AzSPU Waste Management Strategy

Page 4 of 17

waste production. Under the Agreements, BP notifies SOFAZ and informs SOCAR. SOFAZ can

elect to determine where the material goes. If they elect to leave the material with BP then BP can

dispose of the material as scrap or waste.

2.2

HSSE Policy

AzSPUs‟ mission is to ensure BPs‟ reputation as a “Distinctive Operator” is maintained through

efficient waste management operations and close coordination with stakeholders and concerned

state organizations

The company‟s goal is based on the conduct of operations in a safe and environmentally

responsible manner:

“No accidents, no harm to people and no damage to the environment.”

BP‟s AzSPU operations are ISO 14001 certified.

2.3

Group Practise

BP has a Group wide practice Environmental Requirements for New Projects (ERNP) and a set of

Environmental Performance Requirements (EPRs) including an EPR for Waste Management.

Other EPRs such as Water Management and Drilling, Completions & Workover Wastes and

Discharges for example are relevant to Waste Management activities.

BP Environmental Performance Requirements - 11 Waste Management

Provides:

 Design criteria for new projects and Major Modifications, and,

 Direction and Guidance for continual improvement in existing facilities

Intent:

¾ To manage waste so that it will not pose harmful risk to the workforce, local

communities or the environment.

¾ To ensure a Duty of Care for managing waste in a manner that will not pose

harmful risk to the workforce, local communities or the environment. To

apply an approach supported by the waste management hierarchy from

project design through to decommissioning.

EPR-11.7

Cross border export of waste shall be governed by international conventions (where

applicable) and national legislation and minimized in favour of an in-country solution. Any

cross border export of waste should be justified using a BPEO approach.

EPR-11.13

Requirements for specific waste disposal processes shall be followed:

Incineration: Incineration standards should be risk assessed and should implement

recognized international practice to minimize atmospheric pollution. Waste to energy plant

should be considered as far as practicable.

Subsurface disposal: Where appropriate downhole stratigraphy is present and wastes can

be properly isolated and contained in appropriate underground zones, underground

injection should be evaluated to determine if it is feasible and economically achievable to

eliminate surface and ocean discharge of wastes (particularly hazardous wastes).

Landfill: Disposal to landfill should be minimized as far as possible. Where landfill is

required it will be designed and operated according to recognized international practices

specific to the waste type. Landfills should contain and control the generation of leachates

and landfill gases to prevent migration and potential contamination. Wastes being disposed

to landfill should be pre-treated where appropriate in order to minimize their hazardous

Control Tier:

Revision Date: 11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00068-2

Print Date: 01/02/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu

AzSPU Waste Management Strategy

Page 5 of 17

nature. Liquid waste should not be disposed to landfill without prior treatment. Hazardous

and non-hazardous wastes should not be co-mingled in landfills.

BP directly applies its HSSE and waste management policies and practises to those operations

under its control. BP also strives to raise the standards of operations not under its control through

influencing and sharing of best practise.

The purchase and use of hazardous materials will be avoided wherever practicable. Examples of

hazardous materials which will be avoided altogether include: those containing PCBs

(Poly

Chlorinated Biphenyls); and ozone depleting substances (e.g. Chlorofluorocarbons; halogenated

solvents, halons).

2.4

AzSPU Commitments

EPR-11.4

A transparent and auditable waste management plan that complies with ISO 14001:2004

shall be established, implemented and maintained.

EPR-11.1

In the absence of local/national applicable standards or regulations, the adoption of specific

good practice standards shall be proposed and justified on a case-by-case basis using the

US and EU references as guidance and supported by a BPEO Assessment process.

BP will manage hazardous, non-hazardous and inert wastes to internationally accepted standards

in line with Asset commitments and Best Practicable Environmental Options. BP Operated waste

management sites will be ISO 14001 certified. BP aspires in the longer term to comply with EU

standards, Some Assets within the AzSPU business have clear commitments to European or other

standards. It is, however, recognised that the availability of waste management infrastructure

compliant with European (EU) standards is at an early stage of development in Azerbaijan and

Georgia and open to further development in Turkey.

Waste management is a significant environmental aspect as described in the AzSPU HSSE&S MS.

It is the responsibility of each Performance Unit (PU) to regularly update the HSSE&S MS Aspects

and Impacts registers regarding waste management issues in order to maintain ISO14001

certification.

EPR-11.12

Handling and transportation of wastes shall be minimized.

This policy is translated into practice via the adoption of internationally recognized waste

management principles and hierarchy, as follows:

Waste management hierarchy

BP’s aspiration for the management of waste is to apply an approach supported by the

waste management hierarchy from project design through to decommissioning considering

the following key principles.

 Avoid/Eliminate is a core primary objective using life-cycle analyses.

 Minimize:

- The consumption of resources.

- Waste generation through effective reuse and recycling procedures and policies.

 Treat and discharge and dispose are at the base of the hierarchy. BP will aim to

reduce its reliance on these as far as practicable.

 If disposal is required, a process will be selected that minimizes the risk of damage to

the environment.

EPR-11.2

Control Tier:

Revision Date: 11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00068-2

Print Date: 01/02/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu

AzSPU Waste Management Strategy

Page 6 of 17

Avoidance and minimization measures shall be implemented at an early stage through

designing out and consequent contract management (and operations)

EPR-11.8

Emergency Response Plans shall consider and provide for the management of potential

waste streams resulting from the incident or incident response, e.g. soiled oil spill

absorbent material.

BP ensures that where the generation of waste is unavoidable, waste minimization techniques will

be followed which may include a focus on reducing waste at the source, wherever possible, and

waste reuse and recycling i.e. resource management. Minimization methods also considered

include:

Selection of engineering designs and construction practices should consider waste

avoidance and minimisation and this should be a significant aspect of each capital

value process project stage;

Ordering only necessary quantities of materials keeping only practical quantities onsite,

and using all products until empty (aerosol cans, paint, chemicals) - simple business

efficiency;

In Azerbaijan, where possible, returning unused materials to the vendor for credit or

reuse or handing surplus to SOFAZ/SOCAR subject to due diligence based on the duty

of care. If anything can be used, it is not a waste

- the long term financial and

environmental costs from waste management are avoided;

When a process points to a need for a hazardous material, considering if a non

hazardous material could be substituted for the same purpose. If not, calculating

carefully how much of the material is really needed and determine its waste

management options prior to use - waste management factored into the overall cost

benefit analysis;

Preventing spills and leaks by practicing preventative maintenance and good

housekeeping thereby minimizing the use of absorbent materials and minimizing the

production of contaminated waste material - planned prevention of waste production;

Giving prior consideration to the sizes of containers available when ordering products

that could potentially generate waste. Although ordering in bulk eliminates the

generation of waste drums, sacks, and pallets, the intent is to avoid unused products

and/or their containers from becoming wastes

- balancing waste and material

efficiency;

Segregating uncontaminated and contaminated site drainage to minimize production of

contaminated water and waste arisings - process efficiency.

Segregating uncontaminated and contaminated soils, pre-setting criteria when to

terminate clean-up, minimizing secondary contaminations, minimizing ground

disturbance where groundwater table is high and can quickly increase the volumes of

contaminated soil and groundwater - balancing clean-up and waste volumes.

2.5

Other Commitments

Waste Producers in each BP Performance Unit will have Installation/Asset/Office waste

management plans which include current and forecast waste production and all these principles

together with continuous improvement plans. All Emergency Response Plans will consider and

minimise potential wastes and will provide guidance on treatment/disposal options.

Performance Units will monitor waste production and costs and include the development of waste

management and the internal/external costs in their Annual Plans. Waste production, transport,

treatment, recycling and disposal statistics are recorded and reported.

Performance Units directly engage with Tier 1 Contractors and other direct Contractors and to

develop and implement Contractor Improvement Plans. Contract Accountable Managers monitor

contractor HSE performance.

Control Tier:

Revision Date: 11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00068-2

Print Date: 01/02/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu

AzSPU Waste Management Strategy

Page 7 of 17

The AzSPU adopt BP EPR as direction and guidance for continual improvement in existing

operations.

2.6

AzSPU Waste Management Instructions

EPR-11.10

All wastes shall be recorded and during movement or handover shall be accompanied by

Duty of Care documentation.

AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00126-2 AzSPU Waste Management Instructions covers each of the main

waste streams. The instructions set out information and details on cradle to grave actions. Each

instruction includes:

 Description; Classification; Analysis

 Handling procedures at point of production

 Transportation procedures

 Handling Procedures at CWAAs to point of treatment/disposal

 Administrative procedures and additional information including health risks

 Application of the Azerbaijan regulations on Hazardous Waste Passports

See Appendix 1. Index of Waste Management Instructions

2.7

AzSPU Waste Streams Register

EPR-11.9

All wastes shall be appropriately classified, segregated (e.g. hazardous and non-hazardous),

labelled at the source, and stored in suitable receptacles to ensure the safe containment and

transportation of waste.

AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00084-2 - AzSPU Waste Streams Register summarises the information for

each of the main waste streams which have arisen and continue to arise. It serves as a ready

reference to characterisation, hazards, options and current in-country arrangements.

The Waste Streams Register mentions the companies currently providing waste management

services on BP‟s behalf in each country.

2.8

AzSPU Waste Contractor Approval

EPR-11.5

A formal process for the selection, management, and monitoring of waste management

contractors and facilities shall be established, implemented and maintained.

EPR-11.6

Where waste management contractors do not meet BP standards, BP shall provide

developmental support in order to provide capabilities which do meet standards.

BP (Azerbaijan & Georgia) and BIL (Turkey) have procurement and supply chain management

procedures.

Waste Companies in Azerbaijan that are proposed for BP Contracts are subject to the supply chain

evaluation and assessment process and then are entered into the list of Approved Contractors

against specific scopes. This covers all AzSPU activities in Azerbaijan. AzSPU-HSSE-DOC-00069-

2 - AzSPU Approved Waste Management Contractors.

Control Tier:

Revision Date: 11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00068-2

Print Date: 01/02/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu

AzSPU Waste Management Strategy

Page 8 of 17

In Georgia a single source Georgian contractor has been approved for in-Country waste

management operations and an international company has been approved for hazardous waste

export.

In Turkey, BIL (BOTAŞ International Limited), as the designated operator is responsible for the

operation of the pipeline and above ground facilities follow a similar process on behalf of BTC Co.

BIL have contracts with a number of in-country waste disposal/treatment facilities and

hazardous/non-hazardous waste transporters.

2.9

Compliance Management System

AzSPU continually reviews the applicability of waste management legislation and commitments and

these are captured in the AzSPU HSSE&S MS as specific compliance tasks linked to the source

documents. BTC Turkey has identified legislative requirements and made legal commitment as part

of the BTC ESIA process. Turkey is reviewing legislation individually. Performance Units then use

the Compliance Task Manager to monitor and track compliance. Specific Waste Management

Compliance papers are developed as necessary.

See Appendix 2 - Index of Waste Management Compliance Papers

Any situation where it is not possible to fully comply with commitments is documented in a

„deviation‟ prepared by the relevant Performance Unit and which requires approval by senior BP

management (PUL or above

See Appendix 3 - Index of Waste Management MoCs/Deviations

2.10 Best Practicable Environmental Option (BPEO) Assessment

Reference documents set out the Best Practicable Environmental Options (BPEO) for key waste

streams specifically produced in Azerbaijan and Georgia and is shared with BTC Turkey. The

results of this can be found in separate reference documents AZSPU-HSSE-REC-00011-4

(Azerbaijan) and AZSPU-HSSE-REC-00014-4 (Georgia). In Turkey, BIL will conduct a waste

management BPEO study through their contractor. The draft scope has been approved by BTC Co.

and waiting for BIL to process. The intention is to complete the study in 2008 and implement the

plan in 2009. In real terms, a particular BPEO solution compliant to specific standards may not be

feasible in the short term but remains as the underpinning aim.

3. Waste Management Infrastructure

EPR-11.11

Waste shall only be accumulated or temporarily stored for a maximum of 1 year where

legally compliant facilities for reusing, recovering or disposing of the waste are unavailable

and provided associated risk assessments have been completed.

Regionally, waste management infrastructure has been poor although the status is improving. In

real terms, it has not been possible to limit storage to less than one year (EPR 11.11), necessary

although is accepted as guidance for continual improvement.

As an interim measure, when necessary, BP seeks to develop stand alone temporary storage

solutions or contracted services which provide effective control and assurance.

BP delivers waste management transport, treatment, recycling and operations through contractors

using the procurement processes appropriate in each country. The procurement policies focus on

local capacity and competence development. This is evolving as more local companies are

improving their performance based on international principles and standards.

Transboundary movements of waste may be considered as a potential means to deliver overall

waste management best practise. All three countries have either ratified or acceded to the 1989

Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Waste and their

Disposal. This provides specific obligations with respect to the transportation, storage and

Control Tier:

Revision Date: 11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00068-2

Print Date: 01/02/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu

AzSPU Waste Management Strategy

Page 9 of 17

corresponding documentation governing the management of hazardous waste when it is justified.

This is currently the case in Georgia.

Implementation (2008-2010)

The AzSPU Integrated Waste Strategy Milestone Plan sets out the key milestones and deliverables

underpinning the strategy for 2008-2010 and looks ahead to known projects and developments.

4.1

Azerbaijan

It is the Government‟s intention in Azerbaijan to promote the development of in country processes

rather than export. Under the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) between Azerbaijan

and the European Union (EU), Azerbaijan is committed to aligning its environmental legislation with

that of the EU. The Azerbaijan Government are investing in EU compliant waste to heat incineration

and waste collection and disposal in the Baku area and expect operations to commence in

2009/2010. A Presidential Decree signed in August 2008 established the transfer of municipal

management of domestic wastes in the territory of Baku to new joint stock company and promised

regulations.

In recent years BP non- hazardous wastes have been disposed of at a private landfill at Sumgayit.

This site was audited and found to be not fully EU compliant. A new EU compliant BP exclusive non

hazardous waste landfill has been constructed at a different site at Sumgayit and operational use is

to start in 2008. The use of the existing hazardous waste landfill cell at the site could lead to co-

mingling which should be avoided, so the construction of a new BP exclusive cell in 2009 is

planned. BP‟s medical waste disposal via Central Clinic incineration ceased in 2007. BP will seek to

procure new options in 2009.

Existing BP operated infrastructure includes:

two Central Waste Accumulation Areas, at Sangachal and SPS, where wastes are

segregated and consolidated for onward recycling, storage, treatment or disposal

a facility at Serenja, west of Baku city, for Indirect Thermal Desorption (ITD) treatment and

bioremediation of drill cuttings and hazardous waste storage. The ITD process removes oil

from drill cuttings and the recovered oil is re-used in mud manufacture. Options for end use

or disposal of the treated cuttings are being developed in 2008/9.

Existing BP developed routes in Azerbaijan for recycling and re-use include paints, solvents, wood

and metals. In 2009 BP will seek to procure additional recycling routes

Wherever possible, BP onshore facilities self-treat sewage allowing effluent discharge to municipal

sewers or approved routes. Currently some municipal plants themselves have issues with their

processes. Offshore in the Caspian the Azerbaijan Government have adopted a MARPOL

convention which applies reduced suspended solids discharge conditions as from

2010.

Responding to this and in compliance with some ESIA commitments, BP is moving towards more

biological treatment offshore. This will lead to an increase in the volume of sludge for treatment or

disposal in Azerbaijan. BP is seeking sewage sludge processing routes in 2009.

Offshore, cuttings re-injection is in use to a limited extent. This will be the subject of continuous

improvement and will be the basis for the West Chirag development

BP uses a private oily water treatment facility at Serenga which separates oil from oily water and

sludges for re-cycling with cleaning of water effluent. In 2009 BP will seek to procure additional

treatment and disposal routes.

Large quantities of produced water arise onshore and are currently treated and stored at Sangachal

Terminal prior to final disposal. The long term solution onshore treatment and offshore re-injection

will begin to be fully operational in 2009. In 2009 BP will seek to procure contingency treatment and

disposal routes.

BP has developed a number of contracts with local companies for the transport, storage,

segregation, treatment and disposal of wastes in Azerbaijan. In 2008 a procurement strategy based

on 3-5 year contracts was agreed allowing more localisation and capacity development

Control Tier:

Revision Date: 11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00068-2

Print Date: 01/02/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu

AzSPU Waste Management Strategy

Page 10 of 17

Azerbaijan 2008-9 deliverables



An Annual Integrated Audit Schedule together with Contractor Improvement Plans and site

supervision for BP Operated or Sole Use waste operations



Inspection & Influence Plans for non-BP non-Sole Use contracted waste operations



Waste Minimasation and Management Plans and Waste Management Efficiency

Improvement Programmes for each waste producing asset



A Surplus & Waste Management Plan for STEP closure



A Waste Minimisation and Management Plan for West Chirag Project



A Waste Minimisation and Management Plan for Shah Deniz (SD) 2 Early Civils and Pre-

Drilling



A Waste Minimisation and Management Plan for Inspection, Maintenance & Repair (IMR)

Project



Operational use of the BP EU Compliant Non-Hazardous Disposal Cell at Sumgayit



Capping off the current Sumgayit Non-Hazardous Cell



Revised Drill cutting strategy and a Treated Drill Cuttings Management Plan



Sewage Sludge Management Plan and a defined capital project for 2009/10



Hazardous Waste Management Plan and a defined capital project for 2009



Produced Water Contingency Management Plan bridging from the Interim to the Long term

project



Invitations To Tender (ITTs) and agreed revised contracts for Waste Transport Operations



ITTs and agreed revised contracts for the 12 other streams identified in the Semi-

integrated Waste Management Procurement Policy

4.2

Georgia

In Georgia hazardous waste volumes are relatively small and do not support development of

compliant infrastructure. BP, with the agreement of the Georgian Government, exports to EU

compliant sites in Europe. National and international requirements are met before export is

conducted using an international waste management contractor.

In Georgia, during BTC/SCP projects, a municipal waste site at the Iagludja was used for non-

hazardous waste. This was found not to completely meet EU standards and use was stopped in

June 2008. BP Georgia has acquired land at the municipal site in Rustavi and has funded the

design and construction of a BP sole use non hazardous EU compliant waste disposal cell at the

site which should be operational early 2009.

Existing BP operated infrastructure in Georgia includes one Central Waste Accumulation Area at

PSG1 where wastes are segregated, consolidated and stored.

Wherever possible, BP facilities self-treat sewage for discharge to municipal sewers or approved

routes. Currently the municipal plants themselves have issues with their effluent quality. The

majority of BP facilities in Georgia self-treat sewage discharge to approved routes. Currently the

municipal treatment plants have issues with their effluent quality, therefore the use of these plants

are very limited. For BTC/SCP only, sludge is allowed to be disposed to the settlement ponds of

Gardabani municipal plant. For WREP only PS 13 self-treated liquid is allowed to be disposed to

Gardabani municipal sewage system since discharge of any effluent is forbidden at PS13 due to

the existence of a potable water aquifer.

BP Georgia has contracted for the storage of non-hazardous waste and maceration of food wastes

in order to stop usage of municipal waste site at Iagludja and is storing the product pending

development of a compliant disposal route. Usage of a dewatering unit and further composting of

Control Tier:

Revision Date: 11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00068-2

Print Date: 01/02/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu

AzSPU Waste Management Strategy

Page 11 of 17

macerated food waste is planned. However food waste can also be disposed into the EU compliant

none-hazardous landfill facility once it is operational.

Compaction, baling & temporary storage of non-organic domestic waste is occurring pending the

NHW cell becoming available.

The recycling of accumulated plastic waste has been launched locally via plastic shredding

company who sells shredded secondary raw material abroad for re - use. BP Georgia may also be

open to exporting into Azerbaijan for recycling.

Georgia 2008-9 deliverables

 An Annual Integrated Audit Schedule together with Contractor Compliance programmes

and site supervision for BP Operated or Sole Use waste operations

 Inspection & Influence Plans for non-BP non-Sole Use contracted waste operations

 Waste Management Plans and Waste Management Efficiency Improvement Programmes

for each waste producing asset

 A Surplus & Waste Management Plan for Georgia Projects closure

 Operational use of the BP EU Compliant Non-Hazardous Disposal Cell

Hazardous Waste Management Plan 4.3 BTC Turkey

In Turkey, Botas International Limited (BIL) operate the BTC pipeline. BIL is ISO14001 accredited

and is committed to BTC EU standards of waste management.

The main waste generation areas of BTC Turkey section are Pump Stations (PTs), Intermediate

Pigging Stations (IPTs) and Ceyhan Marine Terminal (CMT). Waste is collected and segregated at

the on-site Central Waste Accumulation Areas (CWAAs) that were left from the construction phase.

The time period in which wastes are stored at the CWAAs is kept to a minimum with a commitment

by BIL to limit the storage period for hazardous waste at CWAAs to 6 months. Waste is reused

where possible (i.e. food waste is used by villagers for animal feed). Recycling of wastes is

undertaken wherever possible. Glass, metals, vegetable oil, paper, battery and other recyclable

wastes are sent to Project approved recycling facilities. Non-hazardous domestic and hazardous

wastes are transported to Izaydas facility in Izmit (to date the only hazardous and domestic waste

landfill site which meets the Project requirements in Turkey).

The new Operations CWAA at CMT was completed in March 2008. It is not yet operational and

permitting is not expected to be completed until September 2008. Permanent CWAAs for PTs and

IPTs are still not implemented and are not currently included but considered in the BTC list of

enhancement projects for 2009.

BTC Tu has initiated a project as part of the Regional Development Initiative (RDI) on a cost shared

basis with the local municipality of Antakya to fund improvements to over a two-year period to

achieve EU compliance in three areas:

 design improvements to EU standards, including leachate collection, flare system,

additional drainage, improvements to medical waste storage etc.;

 development of operation waste management plans; and

 training in waste management for facility personnel.

Antakya Municipality, in conjunction with their RDI Implementing Partner, ISTAC, has developed a

tender document to finalize gaps in landfill design and construction. No bids were received;

consequently the Municipality has now decided to combine construction and operation into a new

tender package. In the meantime, ISTAC has started to develop some of the necessary

management plans together with the Antakya Municipality. Due to a delay in the tendering process,

staff training has not proceeded at this time.

Across the project, operations of WWTPs are non-compliant. Non-compliance of WWTP discharges

ranges from 50-70% of the time. However, no discharges are released to the environment; treated

waste water trucked to Project approved Municipal WWTP‟s. BTC Tu has undertaken a project

wide review of WWTP performance and has recommendations for short, medium and long term

ranging from improved operator performance, installation of reed beds and replacement of

Control Tier:

Revision Date: 11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00068-2

Print Date: 01/02/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu

AzSPU Waste Management Strategy

Page 12 of 17

WWTPs. In this matter a WWTP will be installed at IPT1 as part of BTC environmental

enhancements; in addition BIL is implementing enhancement projects to segregate WWTP

discharges from other discharges in 2009.

Turkey 2008-9 deliverables

 Provision of CMT Ops phase CWAA

 Establishment of PTs and IPTs Ops phase CWAAs

 Short, mid and long term waste water enhancement items

 Completion of BPEO study by BIL

 Implementation of BPEO study by BIL (inc. working with Antakya Municipality)

Responsibilities

The AzSPU Waste Management RASCI chart sets out the responsibilities and accountabilities for

waste related issues in the AzSPU. In summary:

The Strategic Performance Unit Leader (SPUL) is accountable for ensuring the delivery of a

sustainable, developing waste management strategy

The AzSPU Waste Strategy Manager (WSM) provides the focal point for the identification and

determination of waste strategy decisions and actions. The WSM is accountable via the Onshore

PUL to the Az SPUL for waste strategy communication and coordination across BP operations and

projects in the AzSPU. The WSM is directly accountable for the Waste Management Strategy,

RASCI Chart; Waste Streams Register; Waste Management Procurement strategy (Az); Waste

Management Development Projects (Az); Waste Management Instructions and Waste Contractor

Approval (Az).

Azerbaijan, the Waste Operations Manager

(WOM) in the Offshore Performance unit is

accountable for ensuring all BP Waste Transport, Treatment and Disposal operations and

Contractors in Azerbaijan are compliant and is the Contract Accountable Manager for Waste

Operations and Transport contractors.

Performance Unit Leaders

(PUL’s) are accountable for ensuring all Operating Assets,

Construction Sites and 3rd Party Operations, Maintenance and Project Contractors within their PUs

are compliant with this document and for influencing those contracted operations not under direct

control.

In Georgia, the Georgia Exports Operations Manager, through its Environmental Manager is

be accountable for contact with the Environment Ministry in Georgia and for ensuring all BP Waste

Transport, Treatment and Disposal operations and Contractors in Georgia are compliant . The

Georgia Environmental Manager is the Contract Accountable Manager for the single source in-

country waste management contractor.

In Turkey, the BTC Operations Assurance Manager, through its Environmental Department, is

ultimately accountable for compliance of BIL‟s Waste Storage, Transport, Treatment and Disposal

and related Contractors.

The AzSPU HSE & Technical Director is accountable for ensuring Environmental Assurance and

compliance with BP EPRs (Projects). This is delivered through the AzSPU Central Environment

Manager.

The relevant Environmental Managers/Team Leads will be responsible for the review of their

operations in Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey to assure compliance of their Operating Asset/ PU

with the specified commitments, plus:



Compliance with procedures and common processes at a PU level;



Regular review and monitoring of Environmental Aspects and Impacts Registers to include

Waste Management;



Reporting data to monitor AzSPU KPIs for Waste Management performance.

Control Tier:

Revision Date: 11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00068-2

Print Date: 01/02/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu

AzSPU Waste Management Strategy

Page 13 of 17

The AzSPU Environmental Manager is the focal point of contact with the Environmental Ministry

in Azerbaijan.

The Georgia Operations Environmental Manager is the focal point of contact with the

Environmental Ministry in Georgia.

The Turkey Environmental Assurance Manager is the focal point of contact with the Ministry of

Environment and Forest in Turkey.

The AzSPU Compliance Manager is responsible for Waste Management Compliance Position

Papers, the HSSE Compliance Management System and the HSSEMS Integrated Audit

Programme

Contractors have a Duty of Care for all wastes arising from their activities and are responsible for

the disposal of the wastes they generate in accordance with the terms of their contracts and BP

AzSPU WM Strategy through:

 Taking all reasonable steps to avoid waste generation and to minimize both the quantities

and the hazards of waste generated;

 Ensuring that all wastes generated are correctly identified, and stored pending

collection/transfer for reuse, recovery, recycling, treatment and/or disposal in an

environmentally sound manner;

 Ensuring wastes are accompanied by the appropriate documentation;

 Regularly monitoring activities under their control to ensure correct handling, treatment and

disposal of waste;

 Reporting / compliance with KPI‟s;

 Working in partnership with company to improve operations and promote the goals of the

strategy.

The appointed Contract Accountable Manager (CAM) is responsible for ensuring this through

ongoing contractor monitoring and assurance (e.g. audits, inspections, QPR‟s).

Document control



Waste management documentation shall be managed via AzSPU HSSE &S MS document

control procedures.

Control Tier:

Revision Date: 11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00068-2

Print Date: 01/02/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu

AzSPU Waste Management Strategy

Page 14 of 17

Appendix 1 - Waste Management Instructions Index, AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-

00126-2

Serial

Waste Stream

Serial

Waste Stream

Absorbents other than oily

Filters (used oil)

rags

Acids

Filters (used water)

Activated Carbon

Fire fighting foam

Adhesive (Solvent Based)

Fluorescent tubes

Aerosol Cans

Freon TF Solvents

Air Drying Desiccant

Fuel - Aviation

Alkalis

Fuel Diesel (Fuel Oil)

Amine

Gas bottles (empty and full)

Antifreeze Coolant

General Waste

Asbestos

Containing

Glycol contaminated with oil

Materials

Ballast Water

Gravel Pack Fluid

Base oil recovered from

Grease

ITD

Batteries Dry Cell

Hawsers

Batteries Wet cell

Incinerator ash

Biocides

Insulation

Bitumen Asphalt used

Lead X-Ray Plates

Bituminous pipe wrapping

Metal Ferrous

Blasting Grit

Methanol

Book Cell

Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)

Brine 1(Waste)

Non Ferrous Metal

Brine 2 (Waste)

Oil (Used)

Buoys Plastic

Oil Delivery Hose

Cartridges

(Printer and

Oily Rags

Toner)

Caustic Soda

Oily Soil

Cement

(returned from

Oily Sludge

down hole)

Ceramic Packing

Oily Water Type 1

Charcoal Filters

Oily Water Type 2

Chemicals

(used from

Paint Cans

(empty and

residue

laboratory)

remaining)

Chlorine tablets

Paints and Paint Sludge

Clinical waste (Medicine)

Paper and Cardboard

Clinical Waste (Sharps)

Photographic Developing Liquids

Clothing and PPE

Pigging Wax

Completion fluids (calcium

Pipe dope

bromide)

Construction waste

Plastic HDPE

Cooking oil

Plastics other than HDPE

Detergents

Produced Sand

Drill Cuttings (SBM)

Produced Water

Drill Cuttings (WBM)

Rubber inc pigging discs

Control Tier:

Revision Date: 11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00068-2

Print Date: 01/02/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu

AzSPU Waste Management Strategy

Page 17 of 17

Appendix 3 - Waste Management MoCs & Deviation approvals

AzSPU Management of Organizational Change Procedure, AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00029-U

Azerbaijan Pipelines (BTC/SCP) Management of Change Assessment Details - General Non-

Hazardous Wastes, AZSPU-HSSE-REC-00036-4

Azerbaijan Pipelines (BTC/SCP) Management of Change Assessment Details - Medical Waste,

AZSPU-HSSE-REC-00038-4

Azerbaijan Pipelines

(BTC/SCP) Management of Change Assessment Details - Oily Wastes,

AZSPU-HSSE-REC-00035-4

Azerbaijan Pipelines

(BTC/SCP) Management of Change Assessment Details - Pigging Wax

Residues, AZSPU-HSSE-REC-00039-4

Azerbaijan Pipelines (BTC/SCP) Management of Change Assessment Details - Sewage Disposal,

AZSPU-HSSE-REC-00037-4

Revision/Review Log

Revision Date

Authority

Custodian

Revision Details

24 April 2006

Namig Abbasov

Amanda Hopper

Initial Issue

20 April 2007

Namig Abbasov

Amanda Hopper

Annual Review

26 September

Alan Jones

Vusal Mammadov

Revision and update

2008

The revision date has been

changed in accordance with

25 September

the request from document

Amanda Hopper

Vusal Mammadov

2009

Authority (from 26

September 09 to 25

February 2010)

11 October

Regulatory,

Waste Management

The document review

2010

Compliance and

Specialist

deadline has been extended

Environmental

to allow detailed analysis

Manager

and changes to address

relevant new GRP

requirements and

organizational changes.

Control Tier:

Revision Date: 11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00068-2

Print Date: 01/02/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED

VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu

Waste Stream Register

Distribution List

Copy

Site/Position Holder

Name

Drill Cuttings & Waste Ops Team Leader

Ahsan Jafarov

Onshore PU HSE Manager

Alan Jones

HSE Manager Major Projects

Alvin Hill

Waste Management Advisor

Amanda Hopper

Compliance Lead, CHSSE

Amir Shah

Environmental Team Leader, Sangachal Terminal

Amjad Shaikh

Environmental Advisor, Logistics

Anar Mansurov

Environmental Advisor, ACG Offshore Ops

Anar Mehdiyev

Environmental Adviser, Sangachal Terminal

Azer Mirzoev

10.

Environmental Advisor, Shah Deniz

Ayaz Hasanov

11.

Waste Management & Cementing Specialist

Chris Greaves

12.

PSCM Specialist, Supply Chain Management

Elnur Zeynalov

13.

Environmental Manager

Faig Askerov

14.

Snr Environmental Advisor

Luda Nevin

15.

BTC Operations Env Engineer, Georgia

Michael Caink

16.

Deputy Environmental TL, ACG Operations Offshore

Murad Safaraliyev

17.

Regional Environmental Compliance Manager

Namig Abbasov

18.

Environmental Advisor, Onshore PU

Nijat Hasanov

19.

Environmental Technical Authority, Offshore PU

Rahim Rahimov

20.

Sr Environmental Advisor, Renewals PU

Ramiz Guliyev

21.

Deputy Environmental Team Leader, Sangachal terminal

Roberta Wilson

22.

Environmental TL, Offshore PU

Russell Putt

23.

Environmental Advisor, Offshore Ops

Sevil Sadikhova

24.

Onshore PU Environmental and Social Manager

Graham Johnson

25.

Environmental Advisor, Offshore PU

Sitara Sultanova

26.

Environmental TL, Onshore PU

Steve Heath

27.

EMS & Audit Coordinator, REC Team, CHSSE

Vusal Mammadov

28.

Environmental TL, Major Projects

William Boulton

29.

Environmental TL, Onshore PU

Yvetta Douarin

30.

Environmental Advisor, Offshore PU

Yelena Legoshina

31.

Environmental Advisor, Onshore PU

Zaur Hasanov

Control Tier:

Revision Date:

11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00084-2

Print Date:

2/1/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED VERSION OF THIS

DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu/component/hssesms

Waste Stream Register

1.0 Purpose

The Waste Stream Register provides specific details of:

 Waste stream nomenclature and definition;

 Waste classification and hazard identification;

 Current contractor and disposal routes options available at the time of issue (See Approved WM

Contractor list AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00069-2 for up to date details).

2.0 Specific Requirements

This is a reference register and should be used when completing WTNs to ensure standardization of

waste streams and definitions. Always use sub classes as applicable.

Read in conjunction with

 Waste Management Instructions, AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00126-2

 Offshore WM Procedure, AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00007-3;

 Azerbaijan West Pipelines WM Procedure AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00302-5;

 Sangachal Terminal Waste Management Procedure AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00037-4 and

 Reporting of Bulk Liquid Wastes Shipped to Shore for Treatment & Disposal AZSPU-HSSE-

DOC-00100.

3.0 Key Responsibilities

It is the responsibility of Senior Environmental Advisor (Waste Strategy) to ensure the register is

routinely maintained.

4.0 Procedure

4.1 All Hazardous Wastes must be accompanied by Hazardous Waste Passports (HWPs) and MSDS

documentation unless otherwise specified. Contact: Waste Co-ordinator, Waste Management Team

4.2 Waste classifications are based on a definition as wastes and not as virgin or unused materials or

products. Contact: Senior Environmental Advisor (Waste Strategy).

4.3 For Group CHER reporting a separate guidance note will be issued but sewage wastes should not

be included in the Group reporting of hazardous wastes.

Control Tier:

Revision Date:

11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00084-2

Print Date:

2/1/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED VERSION OF THIS

DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu/component/hssesms

Waste Stream Register

Categ

Waste Details

AzSPU Routes

Waste

ory

Options

Stream

Description

Hazard

Tur

Unused Chemicals can be

registered

Chemical

Acids are any

Exchange

Program for

Some of them

substance with a

Concentrated acids and alkalis are corrosive and

onward use or return to

reused/recycled

via

1. Exported to

pH<7. Alkalis are

Not

classed as hazardous materials. They may be

sender. Recycling options are

Karvan-L,

EU countries

any substance with

generated.

poisonous and are generally toxic to aquatic

few. Can be neutralized and

2. Stored in containers

Stored in

Hazardo

Acids

and

pH >7.

Generally

IZAYDAS

organisms.

Strong organic acids may be

treated as neutral liquid

at Serenja Hazardous

containers

alkalis

liquid

but,

for

authorized

carcinogenic. Common substances include HCl

chemical

waste.

Waste

Treatment

CWAA pending

instance,

caustic

company

(hydrochloric acid), HNO3

(nitric acid), H2SO4

neutralised and evaporated,

Facility

pending

treatment/dispos

soda

(alkaline

dispose

(sulphuric acid) and NaOH (caustic soda)

solid residues can be land

treatment/disposal

al option

NaOH) may be

filled.

Waste Management

option.

crystalline.

Instruction

(WMI)

002 and

(WMI) 007

1. Exported to

Includes a number

Stored in containers at

Not

EU countries

specific

Need to identify specific adhesive and composition

Allow to cure to NHW solid.

Serenja

Hazardous

generated.

Stored in

Hazardo

Adhesives

products.

Identify

from MSDS. Solvent based glues are generally irritant

Otherwise Incineration; HW

Waste

Treatment

IZAYDAS

containers

Solvent Based

product and active

to skin, eyes and respiratory systems. EEC Solvents

Landfill. Waste Management

Facility

pending

authorized

CWAA pending

ingredients where

directive (VOCs) may apply

Instruction (WMI) 004

treatment/disposal

company

treatment/dispos

possible.

option.

dispose

al option

Aerosol cans are

small

(<1.5 litre)

pressurised cans

comprising

of:

metal

packaging

(Aluminium or Steel

can); product

(e.g.

HAZARDOUS

Puncturing of aerosol

insecticides,

If product or propellant within can is hazardous

cans on site only if

deodorants,

and can is not empty then classify as hazardous

proper equipment is

1. Exported to

lubricants or paints)

waste.

available. If proper

EU countries

Hazardo

held

under

NOTE: TO BE COMPLETED

NON -HAZARDOUS

puncturing equipment

Stored in

us/Non-

pressure;

and

AT NEXT REVISION

Aerosol Cans

containers

IZAYDAS

Hazardo

Classified as Non-Hazardous if can empty of

is not available on

propellant

gas

Waste

Management

CWAA pending

(usually a mixture

propellant and product (depressurised i.e. the

Instruction (WMI) 005

site, cans send to

treatment/dispos

flammable

can is truly empty

(punctured to release all

CWAA SPS for

al option

hydrocarbons e.g.

contents)).

puncturing.

Butane).

N.B. The Generator is responsible for

Commonly found in

classification of the waste.

crew

quarters

(deodorants etc.)

and in industrial

facilities

(spray

paints,

lubricants

etc.).

Control Tier:

Revision Date:

11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00084-2

Print Date:

2/1/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT

http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu/component/hssesms

Created on 01/02/2011

Page 4 of 38

Waste Stream Register

Categ

Waste Details

AzSPU Routes

Waste

ory

Options

Stream

Description

Hazard

Tur

Amines

are

organic

compounds and

are a type of

functional group

that

contains

nitrogen as the

key atom. There

are many uses

primarily

Some of them

intermediates in

reused/recycled

via

1. Exported to

the manufacture

Karvan-L,

EU countries

Not generated

NOTE: TO BE COMPLETED

cationic

2. Stored in containers

stored

in Tu; would

Hazardo

Dependent upon specific chemical composition.

AT NEXT REVISION

Amines

surfactants,

at Serenja Hazardous

containers

be disposed at

May be flammable or corrosive etc.

Waste

Management

quartenaries for

Waste

Treatment

CWAA pending

IZAYDAS if

Instruction (WMI) 008

biocides, flotation

Facility

pending

treatment/dispos

generated

agents, gasoline

treatment/disposal

al option

option.

detergents,

corrosion

inhibitors, rubber

processing

additives,

emulsifier

for

herbicides, textile

softeners,

and

oilfield

drilling

materials.

Re-use

(As Antifreeze or

Liquid

solution

secondary fuel) or re-cycle

Injected into

1. Exported to

(based on ethylene

Mono Ethylene Glycol (MEG) 30-60%. Only Hazardous

(by decontamination and pH

p/l if complies

EU countries

or propylene glycol)

if contaminated

(e.g. heavy metals) from cooling

adjustment). Waste from

with AzSPU

stored

Hazardo

Antifreeze/Glyc

that lowers the

systems. Toxic. Irritant to eyes and skin. Harmful if

recycling will contain heavy

Chemical

Karvan-L, recycling

containers

freezing point and

swallowed, may cause nausea, kidney and Central

metals. If contaminated

(

Management

CWAA pending

raises the boiling

Nervous System disorders. Possible reproductive

heavy metals) haz waste.

Procedure or

treatment/dispos

point

water.

hazard.

Otherwise non-haz liquid

disposed at

al option

Also called coolant.

waste. Waste Management

IZAYDAS

Instruction (WMI) 009

Control Tier:

Revision Date:

11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00084-2

Print Date:

2/1/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT

http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu/component/hssesms

Created on 01/02/2011

Page 5 of 38

Waste Stream Register

Categ

Waste Details

AzSPU Routes

Waste

ory

Options

Stream

Description

Hazard

Tur

Contain (e.g. double bag)

and dispose to special

cell at non-hazardous

landfill. Note, although

Natural

mineral

classed as hazardous,

Some asbestos has

fibre that was used

asbestos can be disposed

been disposed of under

building

Blue

asbestos

crocidolite

to non-hazardous landfill

licence in a specially

materials such as

Brown

asbestos

amosite,

mysorite

if placed in a secure cell

constructed landfill at

Stored in bags

insulation and vinyl

White asbestos chrysotile, actinolite, anthrophyllite,

for this

Serenja. The remainder,

Not generated

within containers

flooring due to its

tremolite Carcinogenic.

When asbestos is

purpose.Otherwise, may

a total of

950 m³, is

in Tu; would

Hazardo

CWAA

Asbestos

excellent

encapsulated, or present in a solid matrix

(e.g.

be disposed to

stored in

bags within

be disposed at

pending

export

resistance to fire,

cement), there is comparatively low risk. However, if

hazardous landfill.

containers at Serenja

IZAYDAS

or local disposal

heat and chemical

asbestos is present in the friable fibrous form,

Hazardous

Waste

generated

Non-hazardous landfill may

options

attack.

Includes

particularly where fibres are dispersed, the potential for

Management

Facility

be used

for construction

gaskets. Insoluble.

harm is much greater.

pending

waste containing asbestos if

See

Directive

treatment/disposal

pre-treated

double

2003/33/EC

bagging.

Alternatively

option.

segregated area in a HW

landfill.

Waste

Management

Instruction (WMI) 010

BTC Tu plans

to receive and

treat

oil

contaminated

slops

required

NOTE: TO BE COMPLETED

BP does not directly

Marpol

and

From

vessels

AT NEXT REVISION

take

oil

tankers.

Turkish

Non-

Oil contamination is main hazard. Risk of alien species

which have taken

MARPOL restricts discharge

Discharge to the sea

Discharge to the

Regulations.

Hazardo

Ballast Water

invasion from non-native fauna and flora

(generally

on water prior to

the

Sea.

Waste

from

Offshore

sea.

The

slops

micro-organisms)

arrival at berth

Management

Instruction

Survey/Pipelay/Supply

reception and

(WMI) 011

vessels, Rigs, Barges

treatment

facility

currently

under design

and scheduled

for completion

by 2009.

Control Tier:

Revision Date:

11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00084-2

Print Date:

2/1/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT

http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu/component/hssesms

Created on 01/02/2011

Page 6 of 38

Waste Stream Register

Categ

Waste Details

AzSPU Routes

Waste

ory

Options

Stream

Description

Hazard

Tur

General purpose

household

batteries.

Zinc

chloride

All may be harmful if swallowed. Contents of an open

batteries used in

battery can cause respiratory irritation.

In small quantiyies, sealed as

low

drainage

original, do not pose ecotoxic

Stored in containers at

appliances such as

Carbon zinc / zinc chloride Treat as non-hazardous

risks. But contents are toxic

Stored

Serenja

Hazardous

torches,

clocks,

waste (all batteries post 1992 mercury free).

and generally treated as

containers

TAP

Hazardo

Batteries:

Dry

Waste

Treatment

shavers and radios.

hazardous waste.

Ideally

CWAA pending

NGO

for

re-

cell

Facility

pending

should not be disposed of to

treatment/dispos

cycle

treatment/disposal

Alkaline

Manganese dioxide, zinc, potassium hydroxide

landfill

al option

option.

manganese

(alkaline). Treat as non-hazardous waste

Waste

Management

batteries used in

Instruction (WMI) 013

personal stereos

and radio-cassette

players

Mercuric

oxide

batteries used in

hearing

aids,

May be harmful if ingested. Sealed batteries pose a

pacemakers and

very low risk

photographic

equipment.

Mercury, zinc, potassium hydroxide, manganese

dioxide

Zinc-Air

.An

Hazardous waste.

Toxic.

alternative

Zinc, manganese dioxide, potassium hydroxide

May be harmful if swallowed.

Stored in containers at

Not generated

mercuric

oxide

(alkaline). Trace quantities of mercury may be present.

Stored

Contents of an open battery

Serenja

Hazardous

in Tu; would

button cells - used

containers

Hazardo

Batteries

Dry

can

cause

respiratory

Waste

Treatment

be disposed at

for hearing

aids

Silver oxide, manganese dioxide, zinc, potassium

CWAA pending

'button cell'

irritation.

Sealed batteries

Facility

pending

TAP

and radio pagers.

hydoxide

(alkaline), codium hydoxide

(alkaline),

treatment/dispos

pose a very low risk Waste

treatment/disposal

IZAYDAS if

mercuric oxide (<1%).

al option

Management

Instruction

option.

generated.

Silver Oxide Used

(WMI) 013

for

electronic

Lithium

cobalt

oxide,

lithium

watches

and

hexaflurophosphate,ethylen carbonate, diethyl

calculators

carbonate.

Lithium is a mildly toxic chemical and cobalt,

Lithium Used for

also found in lithium-based components, is

watches

and

carcinogenic.

photographic

equipment

Control Tier:

Revision Date:

11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00084-2

Print Date:

2/1/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT

http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu/component/hssesms

Created on 01/02/2011

Page 7 of 38

Waste Stream Register

Categ

Waste Details

AzSPU Routes

Waste

ory

Options

Stream

Description

Hazard

Tur

Nickel

cadmium

(NiCd)

batteries

Used for cordless

power

tools,

personal stereos,

portable

telephones, lap-top

computers,

shavers, motorised

All may be harmful if swallowed. Contents of an open

toys etc, with a life

battery can cause respiratory irritation.

of 4-5 years.

Nickel oxyhydorixide, Cadmium, sodium hydroxide

Stored in containers at

Should not be disposed of to

Stored

Nickel

metal

(alkaline), potassium hydoxide (alkaline).

Serenja

Hazardous

Batteries: Dry

landfill or incinerated. Lead

containers

TAP

Hazardo

hydride

(NiMH)

Waste

Treatment

cell

recovery

(EC Directive)

CWAA pending

NGO

for

re-

batteries are a less

Alkaline, Carbon, Zinc, Silver, Nickel, Cadmium,

Facility

pending

rechargeable

Waste

Management

treatment/dispos

cycle

environmentally

Mercury

treatment/disposal

Instruction (WMI) 013

al option

harmful alternative

option.

to NiCd and tend to

Lithium is a mildly toxic chemical and cobalt,

have a longer life.

also found in lithium-based components, is

carcinogenic.

Lithium ion (Li-Ion)

batteries have a

greater

energy

storage

capacity

than NiCd and

NiMH batteries and

tend to be used in

logging equipment

A lead acid battery

has electrode grids

containing

lead

oxides that change

composition

during

charging

Stored in containers at

Not generated

Stored

and discharging.

Hazardous waste. Corrosive. Toxic if contents are

NOTE: TO BE COMPLETED

Serenja

Hazardous

in Tu; would

containers

Hazardo

Batteries:

Wet

The electrolyte is

swallowed. Pb, PbO, PbO2, PbSO4. sulphuric acid,

AT NEXT REVISION,

Waste

Treatment

be disposed at

CWAA pending

cell

dilute

sulphuric

plastic casing Respiratory irritant. Should not be

Management

Instruction

Facility

pending

TAP

treatment/dispos

acid.

Lead acid

disposed of to landfill or incinerated.

(WMI) 014

treatment/disposal

IZAYDAS if

al option

batteries typically

option.

generated

power navigation

lights,

SCADA

systems,

vehicles

and

cathodic

protection systems.

Control Tier:

Revision Date:

11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00084-2

Print Date:

2/1/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT

http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu/component/hssesms

Created on 01/02/2011

Page 8 of 38

Waste Stream Register

Categ

Waste Details

AzSPU Routes

Waste

ory

Options

Stream

Description

Hazard

Tur

Stored at WTSA

Not generated

(waste

Bentonite

in Tu; would

Non-

Gel is

a finely

Re-use or back to supplier.

temporary

Gravel Pack Gel

Bentonite is naturally occurring clay. It is hazardous

Sent to SOCAR for re-

look for re-

Hazardo

powdered

Management

Instruction

storage

area)

(uncontaminated

only if contaminated.

use

use/re-cycle

bentonite clay

(WMI) 059

pending

)

options

landfill

generated.

completion

Gravel/coarse sand

and

finely

powdered

bentonite

clay

mixture used to fill

the space between

the well screen,

Stored at

well casing, and

WTSA

(waste

borehole

wall.

temporary

Likely

Thermal threatment if greater

storage

area)

contaminated with

than 30% Gravel Pack fluid

pending

brine, drilling fluids

Process through ITD

landfill

(SBM/WBM),

Treatment

and

Bentonite, potentially contaminated with HEC & waste

unit at Serenja HWMF

Bentonite-

completion,

Hazardo

Roemex, and high-

discharge/dispose

solid

brine.

Gravel

Pack

non-

Not Applicable

viscosity

residuals if less than

30%

RT Services if less than

Fluid

contaminated.

hydroxyethyl

Gravel Pack Fluid and more

30% Gravel Pack Fluid

2).

Stored at

cellulosic

(HEC)

brine.

Management

and more brine.

CWAA pending

polymer and rock

Instruction

(WMI)

059. See

export

debris cuttings etc.

Waste Brine

treatment/dispos

Greater then

30%

Gravel Pack Fluid.

contaminated

If less than

30%,

classify according

the

main

component e.g. if

brine, see Waste

Brine.

Control Tier:

Revision Date:

11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00084-2

Print Date:

2/1/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT

http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu/component/hssesms

Created on 01/02/2011

Page 9 of 38

Waste Stream Register

Categ

Waste Details

AzSPU Routes

Waste

ory

Options

Stream

Description

Hazard

Tur

Various mixtures of

naturally occurring

solid

liquid

hydrocarbons,

excluding

coal.

Hard dark brown

cementitious

Exported to EU

Re-use bitumen in asphalt

Not generated

material,

countries

Bitumen

(can mix with waste cement)

1. Reused through ITT

in Tu; would

Non-

predominantly

May be an irritant to throat, nose and respiratory tract.

stored

bituminous

Use as fuel bituminous

Asphalt Company

look for re-

Hazardo

bitumens

and

No known hazards from prolonged exposure. Aromatic

containers

pipe wrapping

material

2. Non-Hazardous waste

use/re-cycle

sand/grit. Asphalt

Petroleum Distillate (100).

CWAA pending

& roofing

Waste

Management

landfill

options

is a bitumen with

treatment/dispos

Instruction (WMI) 016, 017

generated.

sand/grit additives.

al option

Pipe

wrapping:

Solidified

bituminous material

used as lagging

and filler around

pipe joints.

Fluids comprising

salt

solutions,

Marine pollutant

/ Irritant.

Depends on specific

polymers,

and

chemical composition. Likely to be an irritant to eyes

other additives to

and skin. Prolonged exposure may cause respiratory

prevent damage to

irritation. Based on sodium chloride, calcium chloride

Offshore Re-injection

the well bore during

etc. Hazard arises principally from calcium carbonate

operations

Pre-treatment

through

and potentially petroleum distillates.

Re-injection

approved

preparing

the

neutralization and filtration to

offshore for ACG field

drilled

well

for

produce

liquid

stream

Nov 07.

production.

suitable for discharge to

1.Hazard dependant on contaminant - see Oily based

sewer system.

Resulting

Hazardo

Treatment

RTS

Brine

Waste brine

muds. Dipropylene glycol methyl ether

Not Applicable

solids may contain sufficient

company then bio

without Roemex.

HCs for ITD treatment prior to

treatment

Sahil

final use/disposal

Sewage Treatment Plant

Waste brine

2. Hazard dependant on contaminant - see Oily based

and discharge.

Waste

Management

containing

muds & Roemex MSDS. Roemex Well cleaner

Roemex.

Aliphatic alcohol, glycol ether, nonionic surfactant and

Instruction (WMI) 020, 021

Interphase of SBM-

Anionic surfactant

Brine-Romex pills

when displacing

well to brine.

Control Tier:

Revision Date:

11 Oct 2010

Document Number: AZSPU-HSSE-DOC-00084-2

Print Date:

2/1/2011

PAPER COPIES ARE UNCONTROLLED. THIS COPY VALID ONLY AT THE TIME OF PRINTING. THE CONTROLLED VERSION OF THIS DOCUMENT CAN BE FOUND AT

http://docs.bpweb.bp.com/dkazspu/component/hssesms

Created on 01/02/2011

Page 10 of 38

Waste Stream Register

Categ

Waste Details

AzSPU Routes

Waste

ory

Options

Stream

Description

Hazard

Tur

Stored in containers at

Solids from Brine

Serenja

Hazardous

Brine and PW

and PW waste

Hazardo

The solid has a residual oil content of 9.2 % (by retort

NOTE: TO BE COMPLETED

Waste

Treatment

treatment

Not Applicable

analysis).

AT NEXT REVISION

Facility

pending

Solids

processes at RTS

treatment/disposal

treatment plant

option.

Verify pH. Cement may present an alkali hazard. Dust

is a skin and respiratory irritant. Prolonged exposure

NOTE: TO BE COMPLETED

Cement returned

may promote dermatitis. Wet cement is a serious eye

AT NEXT REVISION

Cement

from downhole may

irritant. Check hazard nature of other components eg

ITD

processing

Hazardo

Drilling

be contaminated

mud, retarder etc Calcium silicates, aluminates, ferro-

Waste

Management

combination with Drill

Not Applicable

(contaminated)

with

mud and

aluminates and sulfates. May contain traces of gypsum

Instruction (WMI) 025

cutting

contain retarder.

and chromium compounds.

Unused

cement

powder left over

Verify pH. Cement rinsate may present an alkali

from drilling and

hazard. Dust is a skin and respiratory irritant.

Cement

Re-use

Hazardo

well work ops.

Prolonged exposure may promote dermatitis. Wet

Re-used by SOCAR

Drilling

Return

supplier

Not Applicable

Military reference books and manuals (2009-2023, Volume 4) - page 47